The present study attempts
to unravel the Quality-Access Paradox in Indian higher education against the
backdrop of NEP 2020, which has guaranteed equity, inclusiveness, and quality.
Using open-access data sourced from AISHE 2021-22, this study examines in-depth
the complex linkages between the access indicators represented by Gross
Enrollment Ratio and Gender Parity Index with such quality indicators as
student-teacher ratio, faculty qualification, and institutional accreditation.
While the greater part of
the system of higher education is characterized by dramatic gains in access and
gender parity, a few states have attained near or complete parity between male
and female enrollments. These access gains are generally counterpoised by
residual quality disparities, with states having more enrollment exhibiting
weaker faculties, limited research infrastructure, and lower levels of
accreditation coverage that reflect institutional strain brought about by rapid
growth. This asymmetry confirms the continuing Quality–Access Paradox since the
massification of higher education compromises the academic standards.
The present study,
therefore, attempts to integrate quantitative evidence from AISHE with the
qualitative interpretation of the policy goals under NEP 2020 in order to
understand how expansion and excellence are likely to interact in the higher
education landscape in India. From the findings, it clearly emerges that the
goals under NEP 2020 require simultaneous investment in faculty development,
institutional capacity building, and digital infrastructure. Strengthening the
accreditation systems, teacher training, and ensuring equity in funding becomes
critical for maintaining quality as access gets further expanded.
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.
